Problems of Metamonism: Limits and Paradoxes of the System

This article analyzes the limitations of metamonism a philosophical system grounded in the axiom of reality concerning the interaction of opposites. It identifies key problem groups: excessive universality and the risk of becoming a “theory of everything”; methodological challenges (reductionism and lack of operational criteria); ontological presumptions (conflict and chaos as foundational); epistemological traps (self-referentiality and the observer problem); and practical limits (the point of impossibility of negation and sociological risks of dogmatization). The central thesis is that a system reaching the stage of impossibility of its own negation thereby expresses its foundation. For metamonism, this foundation is chaos, preserved as a pure but unrealizable potency. The paradox lies in that metamonism may prove true precisely in its necessity for transcendence, even if false in all specific applications