ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Barbed vs Standard Suture for Laparoscopic Vaginal Cuff Closure
Total laparoscopic hysterectomy is a procedure that is performed each time more often. One of the problems described for this procedure has to do with the closure of the vaginal vault, increased surgical time when suture laparoscopically, complications such as dehiscence of the dome, infections, hematomas and dyspareunia. A prospective study will be conducted to compare two different techniques for closure of the vaginal vault.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence Following Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Laparoscopic vs. Transvaginal Cuff Closure#914362
- Laparoscopic Versus Transvaginal Closure of the Vaginal Vault After Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy#1094005
- Comparison of Hemostatic Agent to Suture in Terms of Hemostatic Function and Preservation of Ovarian Function#1337833
- Comparative Study of Blood Loss in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy by Ligation the Uterine Arteries in Different Techniques.#1162943
- Ex Vivo Study of the Heracure Device for Intra-uterine Morcellation After Vaginal or Laparoscopic Hysterectomy#1104064
Record · ID 1195475
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive