ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Vascular Response of Orsiro vs. Xience Drug-Eluting Stents for Treating Coronary Bifurcation Lesions
This study aims to compare vessel response and clinical outcomes of a biodegradable-polymer, ultra-thin strut, drug-eluting stent (Orsiro, Biotronik) and a durable-polymer, thin-strut, drug-eluting stent (Xience, Abbott) for the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions with two-stent double-kissing crush technique. How the differences in stent platforms affect vessel healing process will be examined by optical coherence tomography.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- COmplex BifuRcation Lesions: a Comparison Between the AXXESS Device and Culotte Stenting: an Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Study#1292702
- DUrable Polymer-based STent CHallenge of Promus Element Versus ReSolute Integrity in an All Comers Population#810632
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With the Angiolite Drug-eluting Stent: an Optical Cohenrece Tomography Study#875807
- Comparison of PROVISIONal 1-stent Strategy with DEB Versus Planned 2-stent Strategy in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.#833216
- Optical Coherence Tomography in Long Lesions#899534
Record · ID 1197084
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive