ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of the Central Venous Catheter Insertion Techniques
The purpose of this study is to compare the differences in central venous catheter insertion time, success rate, and complication between thin-wall needle technique and catheter-over-the-needle technique for central venous catheterization in children.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- "Syringe Free" Long-Axis In-Plane vs. Short-Axis Out-of-Plane Approach for Central Venous Catheter Placement#1231954
- Comparison of Two Needle Insertion Techniques on Success Rate and Complications During Central Venous Catheterization#993445
- Immediate Complications According to Ultrasound-guided Central Venous Catheters Insertion Site: a Non-inferiority Randomized Clinical Trial#1093296
- Long-versus Short-Axis Ultrasound Guidance for Subclavian Vein Cannulation#1075364
- Infection Related to Short-term Central Venous Catheters#836560
Record · ID 1198371
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive