arXiv (All)
open access
How Do Coding Agents Optimize Software and Report Performance Validation? A Large-Scale Empirical Study of Open-Source Pull Requests
Software performance optimization requires identifying bottlenecks and improvement opportunities, and empirically evaluating the effects and trade-offs across performance objectives. Autonomous AI coding agents submit performance-oriented pull requests (PRs) to open-source projects, yet it remains u
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- AI Agent Pull Requests on GitHub: Frequency, Structure, and Merge Conflict Rates#343545
- Open-Source vs. Commercial Coding Assistants: A 2025 Comparison of DeepSeek R1, Qwen 2.5 and Claude 3.7#73346
- Empirical Study on the Characteristics and Evolution of AI-usage in GitHub Repositories: Evidence from Code Comments#266245
- How Developers Discuss Generative AI: A Longitudinal Study of the Visual Studio Code Community#927947
- Why Do Pull Requests Go Silent? Uncovering the Barriers to Contribution Completion in Open-Source Code Review#1037308
Record · ID 1199243
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive