arXiv (All)
open access
EvalResearchBench: Can AI Agents Design Their Own Evaluations?
Recursive self-improvement (RSI) relies on evaluation feedback to assess progress and guide further research, yet repeatedly running complex benchmarks is costly and slows iteration. Human experts reduce this cost by selecting benchmark subsets or designing compact suites. We ask whether AI agents c
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- ScienceBuddy: Recursive-in-Recursive Self-Improvement for Interactive Scientific Agents#1123873
- ScienceBuddy: Recursive-in-Recursive Self-Improvement for Interactive Scientific Agents#1081339
- ScienceBuddy: Recursive-in-Recursive Self-Improvement for Interactive Scientific Agents#919422
- Drafting Agents, Not Just Tokens: Speculative Recursive Self-Improvement for Agentic Systems#1328081
- ResearchFlow-Eval: Tracing the Execution Gap in End-to-End Multi-Claim Autoresearch#1344709
Record · ID 1199458
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive