arXiv (All)
open access
Frontier Safety Policies for AI Emergency Preparedness in China
Chinese authorities now recognize artificial intelligence incidents as a potential source of catastrophe, comparable to natural disasters, cyberattacks, and epidemics. Current regulations require pre-deployment assessments and incident reporting, but mechanisms for emergency preparedness - proactive
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The 2026 Singapore Consensus on Global AI Safety Research Priorities#609049
- Tokenpolitik: How the United States Can Compete with China to Build the Global AI Stack#424357
- Is Artificial Intelligence A Threat?#759892
- 42 U.S.C. § 5197h — Minority emergency preparedness demonstration program#591889
- Artificial intelligence for prognostics and health management in critical machinery: a systematic review#164221
Record · ID 1200810
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive