arXiv (All)
open access
Groupwise Distortion Guarantees for Preference-Based Alignment
Preference-based alignment methods such as reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) and Nash learning from human feedback (NLHF) aggregate pairwise preferences to learn an LLM policy, but a natural goal is maximizing social welfare (average cardinal utility), which comparisons alone need no
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Decoding-time Realignment of Language Models#1199620
- Alignment via Training Against Probes Without Losing Monitorability#1143246
- Alignment via Training Against Probes Without Losing Monitorability#1136796
- Many Preferences, Few Policies: Compact Portfolios for Multi-Objective LLM Alignment#1186436
- Contemporary AI Alignment methodologies and constraints - literature review#696739
Record · ID 1201463
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive