arXiv (All)
open access
Do Time-Series QA Systems Read the Time Series? Evidence Use and Reasoning Reliability
In recent years, time-series question answering (QA) systems have made significant progress. However, generating a correct answer does not show whether retaining the supplied numerical series improves task performance, nor whether the prediction is sensitive to changes in that input. While some syst
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Constructed Indicator: A Practitioner’s Perspective on Interpreting QS Citations per Faculty#977344
- Impact of diagnosis-intervention packet payment reform on pediatric hospital services: an interrupted time series analysis.#242521
- The Systematic Failure of the Philosophy of Time#728188
- "Reading level is just one component": best practices for cognitive debriefing patient-reported outcome instruments with pediatric populations.#420929
- On Treating Past and Present Scientific Theories Differently#766929
Record · ID 1201699
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive