arXiv (All)
open access
An Averaging Alternative to Pre-Trend Testing
We study difference-in-differences (DID) estimation of average treatment effects on the treated when the researcher is uncertain about which pre-treatment periods satisfy the parallel trends assumption. Roth (2022) shows that pre-trend testing can induce bias, complementing the statistical literatur
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Omitted Variable Bias in Difference-in-Differences Designs#1013982
- Inference after data-driven control-unit selection in difference-in-differences with estimated covariance#1156736
- Doubly Robust Estimation of Treatment Effects in Staggered Difference-in-Differences with Time-Varying Covariates#1070772
- What Goes Up Must Come Down? Experimental Evidence on Intuitive Forecasting#221620
- Estimating Treatment Effects in Panel Data Without Parallel Trends#1062829
Record · ID 1201718
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive