arXiv (All)
open access
Parallelism or Concession? Concurrency-Aware Procurement Negotiation for Agentic Commerce
Agentic buyers can cheaply fork a procurement task into many parallel negotiations, but concurrency is not free: every thread consumes resources, and simultaneous agreements create cancellation and commitment risk. We study a one-unit post-order sourcing problem with a single hard-deadline negotiati
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Bidding graph games with partially-observable budgets#384950
- Large-Market Discipline in Combinatorial Double Auctions: No Assembly, Bundle Selection, and Complementarities#615150
- Large-Market Discipline in Combinatorial Double Auctions: No Assembly, Bundle Selection, and Complementarities#614183
- Simultaneous Ascending Bid Auctions with Budget Constraints#942251
- Performing Negotiations: Protocol#937109
Record · ID 1202436
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive