CanLII
metadata only
Hogan v. Canada (Attorney General)
Decided: 2026-09-29. Docket: A-353-26. Citation: 2026 FCA 164 (CanLII). Administrative law — Judicial review — Conflict of Interest Act, s. 29 and s. 30 — Federal Courts Act, s. 18.1 — Commissioner’s proposal described as not enforceable and not affecting legal or practical interests — Court minded to dismiss judicial review as unable to succeed — Motion dismissed with costs — Application to be dismissed absent submissions | Procedure — Stay — RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General) test — Serious issue, irreparable harm, balance of convenience — Whether stay should prevent carrying out proposal and issuing compliance order — Proposal found not to raise serious issue, no irreparable harm shown, public interest weight emphasised — Stay refused — Motion dismissed with costs | Adminis
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Yenovkian v. Shirtliff-Hinds Professional Corporation#976606
- Shamattawa First Nations v. Canada (Attorney General)#1266819
- Suppa Et Al. v. Canada (Attorney General) Et Al.#1079783
- Abdulaziz v. Canada (Attorney General)#1166756
- Ramirez Pineda v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1166761
Record · ID 1204066
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive