CanLII
metadata only
Qiu v. Canada (Attorney General)
Decided: 2026-10-02. Docket: T-286-26. Citation: 2026 FC 1219 (CanLII). Administrative law — Judicial review — Reasonableness — COVID-19 benefits eligibility — Whether CRA failed to properly assess the Applicant’s income — Onus on applicant to show serious shortcoming, Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v Vavilov — Court declines to conduct its own unchartered analysis for self-represented litigant — Application dismissed | Administrative law — Procedural fairness — Opportunity to respond — CRA second-level review — Whether insufficient time was given to provide documents before the final decision — Low end of procedural fairness spectrum for COVID-19 benefits, Cozak v Canada (Attorney General) — Applicant understood deadline and did not seek extension — No denial of fairness
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Singh Maan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1158534
- Droit de la famille — 261441#1039740
- Azubuike c. Copart Canada inc.#1146884
- Detre v. Canada (Attorney General)#1219743
- Singh c. Canada (Citoyenneté et Immigration)#1001760
Record · ID 1204070
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive