Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University Institutional Repository
metadata only
Constructing acceptable use: Instructor boundary‑setting with generative AI
Acknowledging Generative AI’s presence in the higher education classroom, instructors must navigate unclear boundaries around acceptable and unacceptable student use. This quantitative study surveyed 89 instructors across four research‑intensive universities in the United States to examine their per
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Generative AI in Higher Education: A Survey Analysis of Ethics and Adoption Patterns Across University Faculty, Staff, and Students#169438
- Generative AI in higher education: A global perspective of institutional adoption policies and guidelines#1299208
- Divergent generative AI pathways in higher education: a parallel mediation analysis of autonomous use and human–machine synergy.#396131
- AI and Higher Education: Trajectories and Questions#16290
- Mapping the Authorized Boundary: A Comparative Policy-Vignette Study of Generative AI Governance in Australian Higher Education#1077616
Record · ID 1209024
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive