ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
FS VH S/D 500 S-apr in Vascular Surgery
The purpose of this study was to compare safety and efficacy of FS VH S/D 500 s-apr (FS) versus manual compression in prosthetic expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) graft placement.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Vaginal Vault Prolapse Surgical Treatment#979686
- AMBULATE: Cardiva Mid-Bore VVCS vs. Manual Compression for Multiple Femoral Venous Access Sites, 6 - 12F ID#1244272
- Long-term results of autologous scaffold-free tissue-engineered vascular graft for hemodialysis access#1358526
- Dr. Jeffrey Indes#1026917
- Safety and Efficacy of a Vascular Prosthesis for Hemodialysis Access in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease#859501
Record · ID 1213211
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive