arXiv (All)
open access
Multimodal Safety Evaluation Should Measure Controllability Beyond Classification
VLM safety is commonly evaluated through input- and output-level classification. Such classification is necessary, but it does not reveal whether a safety state is accessible or controllable inside the model. We argue that multimodal safety evaluation should therefore report a \emph{controllability
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- SafeAtlas-VL: Beyond Binary Multimodal Safety with Large-Scale Data and Guard Models#793321
- SafeAtlas-VL: Beyond Binary Multimodal Safety with Large-Scale Data and Guard Models#789317
- Are Vision-Language-Action Models Robust to One-Step Observation Perturbations?#1116881
- EgoSafetyBench: A Diagnostic Egocentric Video Benchmark for Evaluating Embodied VLMs as Runtime Safety Guards#1200989
- When Seeing Overrides Knowing: Visual Dominance and Deferral-Based Method for Personalized Safety in VLMs#927578
Record · ID 1215555
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive