arXiv (All)
open access
HarnessSecurity-Bench: Do Security Mechanisms Really Protect Coding Agent Harnesses?
Coding agent harnesses mediate tool use and authorize actions, yet their security mechanisms and runtime effects remain incompletely characterized. We present HarnessSecurity, the first systematic empirical study and benchmark of open- and closed-source coding agent harnesses. First, we derive a ten
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- HarnessSecurity-Bench: Do Security Mechanisms Really Protect Coding Agent Harnesses?#1210225
- SpecBench: Measuring Reward Hacking in Long-Horizon Coding Agents#216902
- RepoMirage: Probing Repository Context Reasoning in Code Agents with Perturbations#229581
- SpecGuard: Proving a Task Is Broken Before the Agent Cheats#1233198
- SpecGuard: Proving a Task Is Broken Before the Agent Cheats#1227414
Record · ID 1217014
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive