arXiv (All)
open access
Scope-Restricted Backtracking Counterfactuals
Interventional counterfactuals evaluate statements such as "had $A$ been $a$" by replacing the assignment for $A$ while keeping the unit's exogenous background fixed. Backtracking counterfactuals reverse this logic: they preserve the structural assignments and instead vary background conditions acro
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Causal Identification from Counterfactual Data: Completeness and Bounding Results#1324490
- Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation#998527
- Counterfactual Marginalisation: Framework for Evaluating Robustness to Nuisance Variables#997768
- Certifying Interventional Agreement Among Observationally Equivalent Causal Models#1116578
- 42 CFR Part 1005 — Appeals of Exclusions, Civil Money Penalties and Assessments#510018
Record · ID 1217752
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive