ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Clinical Performance of ARS Containing Universal Adhesives in Carious Cervical Lesions
Evaluation of composite restorations done in carious cervical lesions restored by a conventional universal adhesive in comparison to a universal adhesive that contains and resistant silane coupling agent according to the Modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria over 18 months.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Glass Hybrid Versus Composite Restorations of Non-carious Cervical Lesions#1283245
- 36-Month Clinical Evaluation of a Universal Adhesive#803596
- Self-Cure vs. Highly Filled Flowable Composite in Carious Cervical Lesions: 18-Month RCT#861587
- Performance Of Cervical Restorations Using Nitric Acid and Mineral Enriched Adhesive Versus Phosphoric Acid and Universal Adhesive#903702
- Different Modes of Universal Adhesive in Smokers and Non-Smokers#1337511
Record · ID 1228383
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive