ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Self-Cure vs. Highly Filled Flowable Composite in Carious Cervical Lesions: 18-Month RCT
The aim of the study is to compare and evaluate the clinical performance of a self cure composite system versus a highly filled flowable composite in the restoration of carious cervical lesions over an 18 months follow up period.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- 36-Month Clinical Evaluation of a Universal Adhesive#803596
- Performance Of Cervical Restorations Using Nitric Acid and Mineral Enriched Adhesive Versus Phosphoric Acid and Universal Adhesive#903702
- Evaluation of Double Layer Application Using a Universal Adhesive in the Quality of Cervical Lesions Restorations#853030
- Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Flowable Versus Conventional Injectable Flowable Resin Composite Restorations in Class I Carious Cavities#895618
- Clinical Assessment of Giomer Based Technology Versus Smart Bioactive Restoration in Carious Class V Cavities#915982
Record · ID 861587
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive