arXiv (All)
open access
Careful Judge: Safe and Efficient Human-AI Collaborative Decision Making
In human-AI collaborative decision making, human review can prevent unsafe AI decisions, but each human judgment is costly. Treating human intervention after AI abstention as a one-off fallback misses the opportunity to improve future AI decisions for greater automation, yet AI adaptively learning f
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Asymmetric Human Compensation: Why High-Recall AI Outperforms Theoretically Optimal Profiles in Collaborative Quality Inspection#160522
- When does a scaling result justify a different allocation? A critical review of resource-allocation evidence for AI systems#1084447
- Models That Know How Evaluations Are Designed Score Safer#984168
- Evolutionary Computation for Trustworthy AI: From Attacks and Defenses to Self-Evolving Era#1187674
- Character Training for Risk-Averse Agents#1142389
Record · ID 1233082
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive