arXiv (All)
open access
Resolving Conflicts Where and When They Arise: Reactive Composition of Multi-Goal Behavior
Multi-goal robotic tasks are commonly delegated to planning, because reactive control is prone to local minima when objectives conflict. We show that many such failures stem from static goal representations, not task complexity: the designer defines the objectives, but where and when they must be tr
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- STRUCTUREDAGENT: Planning with AND/OR Trees for Long-Horizon Web Tasks#1036639
- HarnessWAM: Bridging Prediction and Deliberation in World Action Models#1325233
- The agency gap in AI-supported writing: How reactive and proactive agent designs shape multimodal reasoning#1299197
- Containing Behavioral Cascades from Manipulated Claims in LLM-Powered Multi-Robot Systems#1104722
- CAIRN: Dynamic Fact-Intent DAGs for Multi-Agent Exploration#1117031
Record · ID 1233865
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive