arXiv (All)
open access
Structured pre-generation elicitation versus single-shot prompting in AI-assisted enterprise decision-making: a randomised online experiment
Generative AI speeds, and mostly improves, professional work, but there is concern that users who delegate both the production and the evaluation of an answer may accept weak output and engage less with the underlying reasoning (cognitive surrender). Interventions proposed so far, such as unassisted
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Mitigating Prompt-Induced Cognitive Biases in General-Purpose AI for Software Engineering#120617
- Operationalizing Conscious Intelligence in AI-Mediated Environments: Development and Initial Validation of the Conscious Intelligence Scale (CIS-25)#324463
- When AI Tutors Speak: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment#1050147
- Motivation to exert effort dynamically adapts to reward context and environmental controllability.#1107411
- Looking Is Not Picking: An Attention-Segment Account of Tool-Selection Failures in LLM Agents#280111
Record · ID 1233961
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive