arXiv (All)
open access
Defensive Sufficiency in a Stackelberg Model of AI Security
Feedback from automated testing, human red teaming, and incident response can strengthen an AI system's defenses when discovered failures lead to effective repairs. We study when this feedback process provides sufficient protection and when investing in it is economically worthwhile. We begin by sho
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Defensive Sufficiency in a Stackelberg Model of AI Security#1227255
- Why we need an AI-resilient society#128239
- Risk for AI Agents#1136954
- From Structural Dynamics to Robot Safety Runtime Assurance, Hard Constraints, and Persistent Correction in Embodied AI#695093
- Frontier Safety Policies for AI Emergency Preparedness in China#1200810
Record · ID 1234259
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive