arXiv (All)
open access
Sufficient quantum provenance: retained fields and certified recording precision
Which execution details must a quantum computation retain, and to what precision, to support a declared comparison? We define a sufficient record by the largest Hellinger distance between outcome laws that share it. Our main result is a circuit-derived certificate for continuous recording precision:
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Optimised T counts and active volume estimates for high- and low- level arithmetic subroutines#974192
- Record-Based Ontology (RBO): Individuation,Continuity, and Definiteness - A BCT-derived philosophical framework for facts, selves,outcomes, and observer-worlds#167376
- Inequivalent Quantum Resources from Multipartite State Discrimination#1234510
- FASTAR: FRI Accelerator for Scalable Transparent ARguments of Knowledge#1061173
- FASTAR: FRI Accelerator for Scalable Transparent ARguments of Knowledge#1043035
Record · ID 1234298
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive