PhilArchive
open access
Record-Based Ontology (RBO): Individuation,Continuity, and Definiteness - A BCT-derived philosophical framework for facts, selves,outcomes, and observer-worlds
This paper reframes Record-Based Ontology (RBO) as a BCT-derived framework for individuation. Its central aim is not to offer a complete physical theory of reality, nor to replace Bit-Collapse Theory (BCT), nor to derive the formal structure of quantum mechanics. Its more limited claim is that finite systems require criteria of individuation: not every physical difference automatically individuates a fact, self, outcome, or observer-world for a finite record-bearing system. RBO begins from the BCT insight that experienced definiteness is not a primitive global fact but an agent-relative structure. In BCT, what becomes definite for an agent is not the universal wavefunction as such, but the agent-relative equivalence class of global configurations compatible with the agent’s accessible informational and record structure. RBO generalizes this insight cautiously: records do not create reality, and they are not identical with facts; rather, records are stabilized physical or informational structures through which differences become definite, inherited, and update-constraining for finite systems. The core RBO constraint is anti-overcounting: do not count facts, selves, outcomes, or observer-worlds more finely than the record-constituted differences that make them difference-making for finite systems. This is not intended as a new dynamics, nor as a theory of subjective world-creation. It is an individuation constraint on when physical multiplicity becomes fact-, subject-, outcome-, or world-making relative to finite systems. The framework distinguishes physical difference, trace/correlation, record, fact-for-a-system, and truth/accuracy. It also distinguishes recordhood from representational success: false records are real as records while failing as representations. RBO therefore aims to function as a fallibilist record-realism and as a philosophical extension of BCT’s equivalence-class approach to definiteness.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Experiential Structural Ontology and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics#97029
- HoTT-RO v2 Applications Beyond the Original Project#88328
- The Record-Closure Problem — What Makes a World Internally Complete Enough to Be Lived?#696254
- Attractors#705804
- The Paton System — Global Continuity Statement#697273
Record · ID 167376
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive