arXiv (All)
open access
Do Vision-Language-Action Models Understand Instructions? A Mechanistic Interpretability Study on Language Grounding
Vision-Language-Action models are designed to generalise across environments and task descriptions, raising the question of whether their action generation actually depends on the language instruction, or whether they largely rely on visual cues and superficial correlations. Robustness to variance i
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- CoFL-S: Spatially Queryable Sector Flow Fields for Local Language-Conditioned Navigation#1105100
- Encoded but Not in Control: Revealing the Grounding Gap in Vision-Language Robot Policies#1202654
- GIFT: Goal-Injected Fine-Tuning for Efficient Manipulation Policy Adaptation#975075
- Uncertainty Quantification for Flow-Based Vision-Language-Action Models#282795
- MIGU: Multimodal Instruction Grounding under Uncertainty for Manipulation Planning#1051387
Record · ID 1234545
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive