CanLII
metadata only
Canada (Attorney General) v Roberts
Decided: 2026-10-02. Docket: CA50796. Citation: 2026 BCCA 397 (CanLII). Procedure — Class proceedings — Certification appeal — Class Proceedings Act, RSBC 1996, c 50 — Appeal from order certifying a class proceeding — Certification not an adjudication on the merits — Focus on conditions of confinement during medical isolation — Common issues trial identified as forum for justification arguments — Appeal dismissed | Procedure — Class proceedings — Common issues — Class Proceedings Act, s. 4(1)(c) — Whether certification judge erred in commonality analysis — “Some basis in fact” threshold applied, Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. v Microsoft Corporation — Commonality of experience under “blanket imposition of separate confinement” accepted — Individual issues deferred to later stage — Appeal dismiss
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- R v Alleyne#1251762
- Asghar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1347090
- Medcof (Re)#1347100
- R.E. v. Nova Scotia (Opportunities and Social Development)#1251766
- Camara v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1090894
Record · ID 1236059
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive