CanLII
metadata only
R.E. v. Nova Scotia (Opportunities and Social Development)
Decided: 2026-10-01. Docket: CA 553286. Citation: 2026 NSCA 70 (CanLII). Child protection — Disposition — Permanent care and custody — Best interests of the child — Whether palpable and overriding error in assessing competing care plans — Whether child remained in need of protective services under Children and Family Services Act, ss. 22(2)(g), (k) — Statutory timelines and finality considered — Permanent care order upheld — Appeal dismissed | Constitution — Charter — Fundamental justice — Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s. 7 — Whether absence of legal counsel caused a procedurally unfair trial or patently unjust result — Withdrawal of counsel permitted due to ethical considerations, Cunningham v. Lilles — Accommodations for self-represented parent assessed — No Charter breach fou
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Grewal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#976601
- R. v. Brown#1053802
- R. v. J.P.#824285
- D.V. v. Cordocedo#1251753
- Ashkan v. Yeganeh#1368053
Record · ID 1251766
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive