arXiv CS
open access
Searching for "Harmful Refusal": A Psychometric Audit of an AI Safety Benchmark
Safety benchmarks typically report one overall score for a suite of datasets, each of which may target one or more safety-related attributes, so models with similar overall scores can have very different attribute profiles. Comparing models is more tractable at the level of individual attributes, ye
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Searching for "Harmful Refusal": A Psychometric Audit of an AI Safety Benchmark#1249833
- Models That Know How Evaluations Are Designed Score Safer#984168
- Safety Under Scaffolding: How Evaluation Conditions Shape Measured Safety#1077870
- AISafetyBenchExplorer: A Metric-Aware Catalogue of AI Safety Benchmarks Reveals Fragmented Measurement and Weak Benchmark Governance#13134
- AI Safety: Not Optional, Not Later#999906
Record · ID 1242777
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive