arXiv (All)
open access
An Investigation of Robustness of LLMs in Mathematical Reasoning: Benchmarking with Mathematically-Equivalent Transformation of Advanced Mathematical Problems
Frontier large language models (LLMs) now reach near-ceiling accuracy on standard mathematical-reasoning benchmarks and gold-medal-level performance at the International Mathematical Olympiad. As these benchmarks saturate and their items leak into training data, a high score no longer shows whether
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- LLMPEDIA: Browsing, Verifying, and Comparing the Parametric Encyclopedic Knowledge of LLMs#821148
- Aggregate benchmark scores obscure patient safety implications of errors across frontier language models#29744
- VeriDrive: Verifiable Counterfactual Supervision for Cost-Efficient Vision-Language Planning#1048686
- Computability. Computable functions, logic, and the foundations of mathematics#778633
- The Benchmarking Epistemology: Validity Theory for Evaluating Machine Learning Models#1156222
Record · ID 1247280
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive