arXiv (All)
open access
Verification and Self-Improvement in Agentic AI: Foundations and Limits
Agentic AI systems can improve by searching longer, receiving additional support, or modifying how they propose and verify outputs. A performance score does not distinguish these mechanisms. We compare these changes through bounded verification with hidden terminal randomness. A stage specifies admi
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- FineVerify: Scaling Test-Time Compute with Fine-Grained Self-Verification for Agentic Search#820487
- Beyond Component Testing: Validating Agentic AI Systems#422295
- Running the Gauntlet: Challenging Agentic Tasks#1084254
- The reach of a verification tool decides its value: A controlled study of verification surface, artifact quality, and cost in AI coding agents#793033
- The reach of a verification tool decides its value: A controlled study of verification surface, artifact quality, and cost in AI coding agents#789029
Record · ID 1247538
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive