arXiv (All)
open access
Is Peer Review Really in Decline? Analyzing Review Quality across Venues and Time
Peer review is at the heart of modern science. As submission numbers rise and research communities grow, the decline in review quality is a popular narrative and a common concern. Yet, is it true? Review quality is difficult to measure, and the ongoing evolution of reviewing practices makes it hard
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Top performers and top journals: Persistent concentration in scientific publishing#397128
- Peer review types in European Association of Science Editors members’ journals: a survey study#286922
- How bibliometric indicators align with REF 2021 peer review across disciplines#977343
- How bibliometric indicators align with REF 2021 peer review across disciplines#976772
- Evolution of social norms with heterogeneous preferences: A general model and an application to the academic review process#1275983
Record · ID 1248336
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive