SocArXiv
metadata only
How bibliometric indicators align with REF 2021 peer review across disciplines
Bibliometric indicators are increasingly used to approximate expert peer review, but how well they do so varies across disciplines in ways that remain poorly understood. Existing analyses of the UK Research Excellence Framework (REF) have largely correlated metrics with individual article quality sc
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- How bibliometric indicators align with REF 2021 peer review across disciplines#976772
- LitReview Arena: Evaluating Literature Review Agents with Battle-Style Peer Review Platform#1129367
- Evaluating Bibliometrics Reviews: A Practical Guide for Peer Review and Critical Reading#713365
- “PubPeer is okay, but …”: researchers' perceptions of post-publication reviews#236830
- Understanding Research Productivity and Trends in Mathematics Education using Bibliometric Analysis#709898
Record · ID 977343
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive