arXiv (All)
open access
Justifiable Priority Violations
Making Deferred Acceptance more efficient requires priority violations, but which ones are justifiable? We argue that a priority can be justifiably violated if the affected student either (i) directly benefits from the improvement that caused said violation, or (ii) is unimprovable under any assignm
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Enforcement and Supererogation#112629
- 40 CFR Part 168 — Statements of Enforcement Policies and Interpretations#509479
- A Robust Defence of the Doctrine of Doing and Allowing#748861
- Rule Consequentialism and the Problem of Partial Acceptance#773169
- Is the rule of recognition really a duty-imposing rule?#112185
Record · ID 1248394
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive