arXiv (All)
open access
FearCaut-Qwen: Affective Steering in a Vision-Language Model Shifts the Decision Criterion for Hazard Assessment
Vision-language models (VLMs) show great potential for damage assessment after a disaster, but a recurring deficiency is that they are reluctant to declare a hazard; that is, recall is low even when overall accuracy appears adequate. This study examines that deficiency by using signal detection theo
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Are Vision-Language-Action Models Robust to One-Step Observation Perturbations?#1116881
- Real Images, Worse Judgments: Evaluating Vision-Language Models on Concreteness and Imagery#974439
- Looked but didn't see: inattentional blindness and yes-bias confabulation in vision-language models#377123
- Localized Conformal Safety Monitoring with Vision-Language Models for Autonomous Driving#1187079
- From Knowing to Abstaining: Bridging the Representation-Action Gap in Vision-Language Models#1116984
Record · ID 1249266
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive