arXiv (All)
open access
A persistent accuracy ceiling in automated verbal deception detection
Automated methods have been proposed to overcome the limitations of human verbal deception detection, but evidence remains fragmented across disciplines. We systematically reviewed 25 years of research (289 reports, 6,136 classification models) and meta-analyzed 3,653 models nested within 97 dataset
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- An experimental study analysing effect of communication medium and motivation on deception detection in interpersonal dyadic interactions#965915
- Chatbot Engagement Does Not Always Beget Metalearning: Evidence from Three Countries#1117070
- Detecting Deceptive Chat-Based Communication Using Typing Behavior and Message Cues#387063
- Probe Generalization as Subspace Selection for OOD Deception Detection#925276
- Probe Generalization as Subspace Selection for OOD Deception Detection#921040
Record · ID 1249542
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive