arXiv (All)
open access
Chatbot Engagement Does Not Always Beget Metalearning: Evidence from Three Countries
Chatbots deliver real-time fact-checks, but whether a chatbot correction leaves anything behind once the chatbot is gone - metalearning, distinct from correcting misbeliefs - is untested. We report a preregistered, three-country randomized experiment (USA, India, Singapore; N ~ 2,200) on out-of-cont
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- (How) Do MLLMs Report Bistable Images Like Humans?#1071060
- On trusting chatbots#110207
- Users' prompting strategies and ChatGPT's contextual adaptation shape conversational information-seeking experiences.#13687
- API Benchmark Scores Do Not Reliably Transfer to Chatbot Interfaces#1110343
- ChatGPT is not bullshit, nor is it not not bullshit#714042
Record · ID 1117070
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive