NCBI PubMed Central
open access
Navigating the ethical landscape of scholarly publishing: a comparative evaluation of Gemini and DeepSeek LLMs in addressing authorship and contributorship disputes.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Predatory Paradox: Ethics, Politics, and Practices in Contemporary Scholarly Publishing#177805
- The Myth of Open Scholarship — On the Architecture of Access and the Quiet Return of Gatekeeping#715900
- From policing authors to stewarding science: Governing artificial intelligence across the scientific publishing pipeline in medical journals#436211
- Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship#1104390
- The Monopoly and Monetization of Academic Publication Rights: Toward Fairness in Scholarly Publishing Rights#263541
Record · ID 125601
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive