Zenodo (CERN)
open access
CC BY-NC 4.0
The Predatory Paradox: Ethics, Politics, and Practices in Contemporary Scholarly Publishing
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Periódicos predatórios: práticas científicas questionáveis?#1135555
- Navigating the ethical landscape of scholarly publishing: a comparative evaluation of Gemini and DeepSeek LLMs in addressing authorship and contributorship disputes.#125601
- Nursing faculty's experiences of publication stress and research integrity: a phenomenological study in Jordan universities.#263174
- The Monopoly and Monetization of Academic Publication Rights: Toward Fairness in Scholarly Publishing Rights#693492
- The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts#686405
Record · ID 177805
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive