ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Efficacy of Propofol Combination With Either Ketamine, Dexmedetomidine or Midazolam for Sedation During Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Procedures
The investigators are comparing the efficacy of three different sedative agents in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Sedation for Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Pediatric Patients#979354
- Analgesia During Pediatric Digestive Endoscopy: a Comparison of Two Protocols for Procedural Sedation#833014
- Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol Sedation for Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy in Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea#810919
- Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol for Sedation During Awake Endotracheal Intubation#903986
- Comparative efficacy and post-discharge adverse events of intranasal dexmedetomidine combined with different oral medications for procedural sedation in children: a randomized controlled trial.#165853
Record · ID 1261582
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive