ERIC
public full text
Public Domain
Moving beyond the STEM/Non-STEM Dichotomy: Wage Benefits to Increasing the STEM-Intensities of College Coursework and Occupational Requirements
Using a sample of college graduates from the NLSY97, we introduce a new approach to assessing wage benefits of STEM training, STEM jobs, and the match between the two: rather than classify individuals dichotomously as STEM or non-STEM, we measure the STEM-intensities of both their college coursework
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- STEM Knowledge in Non-STEM Occupations: Implications for Community Colleges#1265500
- "What If I Had Participated?" A Machine Learning-Based Counterfactual Analysis of Non-Participants' Success Potential in STEM Competitions: The Case of the German Physics Olympiad#1129748
- 42 U.S.C. § 6626 — Working group on inclusion in STEM fields#591452
- DP18609: Determinants and Wage Penalty of Skills Mismatch: Cross-Country Evidence from ETF Partner Countries#166614
- Predicting labour force types#433151
Record · ID 1265489
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive