CanLII
metadata only
Musembi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
Decided: 2026-10-08. Docket: IMM-18170-24. Citation: 2026 FC 1241 (CanLII). Citizenship and immigration — Permanent residence — Inadmissibility for misrepresentation — Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, para. 40(1)(a) — Whether officer unreasonably found misrepresentation in prior TRV application — Material fact relating to marital status inducing or capable of inducing error — Broad duty of truthful disclosure emphasised — Application for judicial review dismissed | Citizenship and immigration — Inadmissibility — “Innocent misrepresentation” — Whether third-party insertion of false information excuses misrepresentation — No requirement of “knowingly” or “wilfully” under IRPA para. 40(1)(a) — Narrow exception in extraordinary circumstances not established — Applicant responsible for c
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- 13 U.S.C. § 214 — Wrongful disclosure of information#565183
- 33 U.S.C. § 931 — Penalty for misrepresentation#585733
- Kamdem c. Canada (Sécurité publique et Protection civile)#1166764
- Identity falsification related to marital status is an act in which a person with a marital history declares themselves as single or unmarried. This act is generally carried out to conceal their true condition or to obtain certain benefits. This practice can be found in personal relationships and in various administrative matters that require information regarding marital status. As a result, others who rely on this information can suffer losses, both socially, morally, and legally, because the data provided does not reflect the actual situation. This study aims to analyze the forms of identity falsification related to marital status and examine the legal consequences that can arise from this act. The method used is a normative juridical approach by examining various laws and relevant legal literature. The results of the study indicate that false statements regarding single status by individuals who have been married can be classified as providing false information, especially when used in official documents or certain legal procedures. Therefore, it is necessary to increase legal understanding among the public and strengthen population data verification mechanisms to minimize the occurrence of identity misuse and provide adequate protection for injured parties.#681811
- 35 U.S.C. § 255 — Certificate of correction of applicant’s mistake#586590
Record · ID 1266811
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive