CanLII
metadata only
R. v. Abdullahi
Decided: 2026-10-07. Docket: COA-25-CR-1431. Citation: 2026 ONCA 715 (CanLII). Criminal and statutory offences — Defences — Self-defence — Criminal Code, s. 34(1) — Whether self-defence was assessed for each charge, including the initial assault — Trial judge focused on later assaults and failed to consider self-defence for the earlier assault and whether the weapon was in hand before others arrived — Appeal granted, acquittals set aside, new trial ordered | Criminal and statutory offences — Defences — Reasonableness — Criminal Code, s. 34(2) — Whether the reasonableness assessment must be “a global, holistic exercise” — Trial judge failed to consider the accused’s earlier assault and role in the incident when assessing later force — Improperly narrowed analysis to the moment of threat — A
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- S.M. c. R.#1090907
- R v IA#1039747
- R. v. Akohene-Mensah#1266825
- R v WA#1368070
- The Director Of Public Prosecutions [At The Suit Of Detective Garda Ronan O'Meara] v Evans (Approved) [2026] IEHC 216 (10 April 2026)#184390
Record · ID 1266823
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive