Munich Personal RePEc Archive
metadata only
Innovation and Imitation with and without Intellectual Property Rights
An extensive empirical literature indicates that returns from innovation are appropriated primarily via mechanisms other than formal intellectual property rights -- and that `imitation' is itself a costly activity. However most theory assumes the pure nonrivalry of `ideas' with its implication that,
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- When hype polarises: the polarisation of moral evaluations around hyped innovations#1055287
- Spill Your (Trade) Secrets: Knowledge Networks as Innovation Drivers#1133029
- AI and IP: Theory to Policy and Back Again – Policy and Research Recommendations at the Intersection of Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property#663627
- The Future of Intellectual Property Protection Between International Law and Emerging Technologies.#1178621
- When are IP Rights Necessary? Evidence from Innovation in IP's Negative Space#1235081
Record · ID 1276224
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive