Munich Personal RePEc Archive
metadata only
On Measuring Governance: Framing Issues for Debate
This paper proposes three principles for users and producers of governance indicators that both summarize the challenges in measurement and suggest ways forward: (1) all governance indicators have measurement error, (2) there are no silver bullets, and (3) the links from governance to development ou
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Governance causality theory: A causal architecture for regulatory and administrative systems#212186
- Governance and Stakeholders#21443
- Benchmarking and Delegated Benchmarks: Aligning Incentives and Total-Fund Outcomes#1374653
- RFC-ATF-12: Agent Trust Fabric — Federation, Timeline, and Human-in-the-Loop Governance Layer. Cross-Organizational Governance Receipts, Public Governance Timeline, and Human Approval Receipts as First-Class Governance Artifacts#286885
- The Authority Resolution Framework: A Five-Domain Ontology for Governing Who and What Decides, at Scale#616465
Record · ID 1277885
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive