Munich Personal RePEc Archive
metadata only
Flip-Flopping: Ideological Adjustment Costs in the United States Senate
Models of electoral competition in which candidates can change position at no cost predict the convergence of platforms in a two-candidate election. Such convergence is at odds with empirical observation. In this paper, I undertake a study of candidate positioning in the United States Senate and
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Opinion dynamics under electoral shocks in competitive campaigns#1011040
- Relative economic performance and the incumbent vote: a reference point theory#955262
- Toward Optimality: A Tighter Analysis of Message Complexity for Leader Election in Diameter-Two Networks#120468
- Presidential elections: centrality, context and implications#23057
- Do polls underestimate support for right-wing parties? Assessing variation in polling error by party family#1193757
Record · ID 1278209
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive