ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Versus Conventional Epidural Techmique
This study will be conducted on 50 patients of ASA grade I and II aged from 25 to 55 years and presented for laparoscopic hysterectomy. Patients will be divided into two equal groups; group A control group for conventional epidural technique(n=25) and group B for 25G dural puncture epidural with 25G pencil point Whitacre spinal needle (n=25). Randomization will be done using computer generated number and concealed using sequentially numbered, sealed opaque envelope.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Regional Blocks of Gynecological Surgeries#1363182
- Prospective Study for Vaginal Vault Prolapse After Hysterectomy: Comparison of Two Surgical Methods#848182
- Clinical Evaluation of the EpiFaith™ Syringe in Epidural Pain Management#980076
- Recovery and Analgesia After Surgery for Gynecological Cancer#899051
- Quadratus Lumborum Block vs Erector Spinae Plane Block in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy#1281362
Record · ID 1292740
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive