ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Regional Blocks of Gynecological Surgeries
This study will be conducted on 273 patients of ASA grade I and II aged from 25 to 55 years and presented for elective vaginal surgeries such as vaginal hysterectomy, repair of prolapse Patients will be divided into three equal groups; group A control group for conventional epidural technique(n=91), group B for dural puncture epidural with 27G pencil point Whitacre spinal needle (n=91) and group C for dural puncture epidural with 25G pencil point Whitacre spinal needle(n=91). Randomization will be done using computer generated number and concealed using sequentially numbered sealed opaque envelope.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Versus Conventional Epidural Techmique#1292740
- GYNECARE PROSIMA* Pelvic Floor Repair System for Pelvic Organ Prolapse#830157
- Evaluation the Impact of the "Pas" Technique Versus the "Standard" Technique on Radiation Exposure#1370879
- Comparing Through-the-Needle With Suture-Method Catheter Designs for Popliteal Nerve Blocks#826220
- Clinical Evaluation of the EpiFaith™ Syringe in Epidural Pain Management#980076
Record · ID 1363182
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive