ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Post Extraction Alterations Following Ridge Preservation In The Esthetic Zone Using Partially Demineralized Autogenous Dentine Graft Versus Xenograft
the aim of this study is to establish if there are clinical, radio-graphical and histomorphometrical differences between using Partially Demineralized Dentin graft versus Xenograft in the esthetic zone. as a clinical application in alveolar bone regeneration procedures related to implant dentistry, including socket preservation, alveolar ridge augmentation, after tooth extraction in the esthetic zone. After extraction of non-restorable teeth in the esthetic zone, will ridge preservation with application of partially demineralized autogenous dentin graft produce less hard tissue changes compared to xenograft? The initial therapy consists of periodontal treatment (phase I therapy) including supragingival scaling, subgingival debridement if needed, adjustment of faulty restoration and polishing. The mechanical plaque control instructions for each patient include brushing and interdental cleaning techniques. Flapless and atraumatic tooth extraction will be initiated, Then the sockets will be carefully packed with the allocated graft material that are shaped to match the individual size and contours of each socket. Once the grafts are properly adapted to the sockets, they will be covered with collagen membrane. The membrane will be shaped to extend 2-3 mm beyond the margins of the extraction socket and positioned just beneath the marginal mucosa. To ensure its stability, a cross-suture will be performed, securing the membrane in place. Intervention group: The socket will be filled with partially demineralized autogenous dentin graft Control group: The socket will be filled with xenograft . For both groups, All the subjects will be evaluated at pre-surgical, baseline and 6 months post surgical months for clinical parameters and baseline( immediate post-surgical and 6 months post-surgical . Outcomes: Change in radiographic horizontal ridge width at 1mm below the most coronal aspect of the crest , Change in radiographic horizontal ridge width at 3 and 5mm below the most c
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evaluation of Immediate Implant Placement Using Dual Zone Approach Versus Connective Tissue Graft#1073238
- Post Extraction Changes After Ridge Preservation Using Allogeneic Dentin Matrix Vs Demineralized Freeze Dried Allograft#874573
- Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Following Tooth Extraction Using Bovine Xenograft With Platelet Rich Fibrin Membrane#870390
- Split Crest Procedure: Is It Necessary to Fill the Gap?#902596
- Leukocyte-platelet Rich Fibrin for Alveolar Ridge Preservation#1246651
Record · ID 1296097
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive